Free Trade Agreements Regulation
A free trade agreement is therefore an important trade instrument managed by the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC), in accordance with the agreement on the Eurasian Economic Commission of 18 November 2011, which authorises the EEC to carry out its activities with a view to establishing commercial treatment with third countries. At the international level, there are two databases of access to self-service that have been developed by international organizations for policy makers and businesses: of course, this clear distribution does not mean that ratification of free trade agreements lacks democratic legitimacy. Responsibility for trade policy rests with the EU; since the Lisbon Treaty, trade agreements must be ratified by the European Parliament. Nevertheless, Member States` parliaments should be informed in a timely and comprehensive manner of negotiations on free trade agreements in order to allow for a well-informed public debate. A transparent negotiation process also includes the publication of the European Commission`s negotiating mandates. Economists have tried to assess the extent to which free trade agreements can be considered public goods. First, they deal with a key element of free trade agreements, the system of on-board tribunals, which act as arbiters in international trade disputes. These serve as a clarification of existing statutes and international economic policies, as confirmed by trade agreements.  It should be noted that the qualification of the original criteria presents a difference in treatment between the inputs of origin and those outside the free trade agreement. Inputs originating from a foreign party are normally considered to originate from the other party when they are included in the manufacturing process of that other party.
Sometimes the production costs generated by one party are also considered to be those of another party. Preferential rules of origin generally provide for such a difference in treatment in determining accumulation or accumulation. This clause also explains the impact of a free trade agreement on the creation and diversion of trade, since a party to a free trade agreement is encouraged to use inputs from another party to allow its products to originate.  The second way of looking at free trade agreements as public goods is related to the growing tendency to make them «deeper». The depth of a free trade agreement relates to the additional types of structural policies it covers. While older trade agreements are considered more «flat» because they cover fewer areas (for example. B tariffs and quotas), recent agreements cover a number of other areas, ranging from e-commerce services and data relocation. Since transactions between parties to a free trade agreement are relatively cheaper than those with non-parties, free trade agreements are considered excluded.